The message arrived on a Tuesday: "Did anyone else paste that buggy library with those hardcoded API keys into that AI tool?" The Slack channel went quiet. Then the security team jumped in. Another company was about to learn an expensive lesson about AI safety - the hard way.

This isn't a unique story. As AI tools like ChatGPT, CoPilot, and Claude become more powerful, they're changing how we work - and creating new security challenges that not everyone is prepared for. Let me tell you why this matters, and what you need to know.

DeepSeek also leaped onto the scene recently, impressing technologists with their ability to answer difficult questions and understand and improve complex code. Already, it's helping enhance the code that powers the web we use every day.

But there's a catch - actually, several catches.

First, while DeepSeek is technically impressive, its hosted version comes with strings attached. Every query you make could be stored and potentially reviewed by authorities in China. The model actively avoids certain topics and enforces specific information boundaries. Questions about Chinese leadership? You won’t get anything remotely critical if anything at all. ChatGPT, Claude, and others certainly suffer from training bias, but generally, they aren’t explicitly censored in this fashion.

More importantly, this highlights a broader issue affecting all AI tools: what happens to the data we share with them?

Consider what people often paste into these AI assistants:

• Code snippets that might contain API keys
• Configuration files with security settings
• Business logic, which could include trade secrets
• Sensitive personal questions
• Business data records

Each of these could be an entry point into business systems.

Thoughtful organizations are already adapting. Samsung banned ChatGPT after employees accidentally leaked sensitive code. JPMorgan restricted AI tool usage. They learned the hard way that convenience can come at a high cost. These are risk-averse organizations, though, with significant external audit oversight.

So how do we use these powerful tools safely? Here's some general guidance:

Never share these with any AI service (free or paid)

• Health records or medical information
• Tax documents or financial statements
• Government IDs or social security numbers
• Security credentials or private keys
• Sensitive customer data or business secrets

For regular work

• Free AI services are fine for public information
• Use them for general questions and learning
• Share sanitized, anonymous examples
• Stick to conceptual discussions
• Avoid anything proprietary

For business use

• Use paid enterprise versions with strong data security agreements
• Know where your data is being processed
• Have clear usage policies for employees (see above)

The most sophisticated organizations are treating AI tools like any other third-party service. They're implementing acceptable use policies, training employees to recognize sensitive data, and setting up secure internal alternatives.

This may sound obvious. What's less obvious is how to build organizations that consistently make these distinctions. It's not quite enough to have policies. You need to create an environment where people intuitively understand the risks if they’re in a position with access to sensitive information.

The free versions of AI models aren’t so different than having a conversation in a crowded café - anyone might be listening. Paid versions are more like a private meeting room, but even they're not entirely secure. A risk averse mindset is if you wouldn't want something appearing on a public website, don't share it with an AI service.

DeepSeek represents both the promise and the peril of modern AI. Its technical achievements are impressive - it's doing things with less computing power that usually require massive resources. It's open-source, which means developers can examine and improve it. But its hosted version also shows how political and cultural constraints can shape AI and the answers it returns.

The future of AI isn't just about what these models can do - it's about learning to use them responsibly. Just like we developed good habits around email and social media, we need to build good habits around AI interaction. The time to start is now.

These tools can be incredibly useful tools to increase efficiency and productivity. They can help us solve problems, learn faster, and be more productive. But they're not private vaults or confidential counselors. Use them wisely, and they'll make you better at what you do. Use them carelessly, and you might find your secrets aren't secret anymore.

The story of DeepSeek isn't just about a new AI model. It's about the future where AI tools are everywhere and where the line between helpful and harmful often comes down to how carefully we use them.

The good news? These challenges are manageable with the right awareness and policies. The bad news? Many organizations are still catching up to the risks. Don't let your company - or your personal data - be part of someone else's learning experience.

‍